why remove dew claws on dogs

Yum Al Zember

3 min read

·

27-11-2024

3

0

Share

The Controversial Practice of Dew Claw Removal in Dogs: A Comprehensive Overview

The removal of dewclaws, also known as dewclaw removal or onychectomy, is a common practice in many dog breeds, particularly those bred for hunting or working purposes. However, this procedure remains highly controversial, sparking debate among veterinarians, breeders, and dog owners alike. This article delves into the reasons behind dewclaw removal, exploring both the purported benefits and the ethical and veterinary concerns surrounding this practice. We'll examine the procedure, potential complications, and alternative approaches, drawing on scientific literature and expert opinions.

What are Dewclaws?

Dewclaws are rudimentary digits located on the inside of a dog's front legs, and sometimes on the hind legs. Unlike the main toes, they typically don't touch the ground during normal walking. Their function in dogs is debated, but some research suggests they might play a role in gripping or traction on uneven terrain (although their significance in this regard is minimal in most breeds).

Why are Dewclaws Removed?

The primary reasons cited for dewclaw removal often center around practicality and breed standards:

• Prevention of Injury: A common argument for removal is the prevention of injury to the dewclaw. Dewclaws can snag on objects, leading to tears, infections, or even avulsions (complete tearing off of the claw). This is particularly prevalent in active dogs or those participating in sports or hunting activities. This point is frequently raised, but the actual incidence of significant injuries requiring medical intervention is not consistently documented in scientific literature.

• Breed Standards: Some breed standards, particularly in working and hunting breeds, specify the removal of dewclaws. Conforming to these standards is important for breeders showing their dogs in conformation events. This practice is driven by aesthetics and tradition, rather than a clear demonstrable benefit for the dog's health.

• Hygiene: While less frequently cited, some argue that dewclaws can trap dirt and debris, leading to hygiene issues. However, regular grooming effectively mitigates this concern.

Scientific Evidence and the Debate:

The scientific literature on the benefits of dewclaw removal is limited and often inconclusive. While anecdotal evidence suggests a reduction in injuries, robust studies comparing the incidence of dewclaw injuries in dogs with and without removed dewclaws are scarce. Many veterinary professionals argue that routine dewclaw removal is a prophylactic procedure performed without sufficient justification.

For example, while research might highlight the potential for dewclaw injuries, it doesn't always quantify the frequency or severity of these incidents sufficiently to justify the removal as a routine procedure. A comprehensive review of the scientific literature is needed to clearly assess the benefits and risks.

Ethical Considerations:

The ethical aspects of dewclaw removal are a major source of contention. Many view the procedure as unnecessary mutilation, arguing that it violates the dog's bodily integrity. The argument often centers around the principle of performing procedures only when they demonstrably improve the animal's well-being. In the case of dewclaw removal, this threshold is frequently questioned. The American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) notes that the decision to remove dewclaws should be made on a case-by-case basis, considering the potential benefits and risks, and not based solely on breed standards or the owner's preference.

Potential Complications and Risks:

Dewclaw removal, like any surgical procedure, carries inherent risks. These include:

• Bleeding: Excessive bleeding can occur during or after the procedure.
• Infection: Infection is a potential complication that can lead to severe problems if not properly treated.
• Pain and discomfort: Dogs experience pain and discomfort during and after the procedure, requiring appropriate analgesia.
• Neuroma formation: The formation of neuromas (benign nerve tumors) is a potential long-term complication, leading to chronic pain.
• Phantom limb pain: This is a less common but possible complication.

Alternatives to Removal:

Instead of routine removal, several alternatives can mitigate the risk of dewclaw injuries:

• Regular Trimming: Regular trimming of the dewclaw prevents overgrowth and reduces the chance of snagging.
• Protective Booties: Using protective booties during activities that might increase the risk of injury can safeguard the dewclaws.
• Careful Monitoring: Regularly checking for signs of injury or infection.

Conclusion:

The decision of whether or not to remove a dog's dewclaws is a complex one, involving veterinary, ethical, and personal considerations. While arguments for removal center around injury prevention, the lack of robust scientific evidence supporting routine removal warrants careful consideration. The ethical concerns surrounding unnecessary mutilation are significant, and the potential risks associated with the procedure cannot be ignored. A collaborative approach between veterinarians, breeders, and dog owners is crucial in determining the most appropriate course of action for each individual dog, prioritizing the animal's well-being above breed standards or convenience. Rather than routinely removing dewclaws, proactive measures such as regular trimming, protective footwear, and diligent monitoring offer viable alternatives that should be prioritized. Further research is needed to fully elucidate the benefits and risks associated with dewclaw removal, enabling a more evidence-based approach to this contentious practice. This information is for educational purposes and should not be considered medical advice. Always consult with your veterinarian before making any decisions regarding your dog's health.