was taken or was took

Yum Al Zember

3 min read

·

26-11-2024

4

0

Share

Was Taken or Was Took: A Deep Dive into Grammatical Correctness and Usage

The seemingly simple question of "was taken" versus "was took" often trips up even native English speakers. While the answer might seem obvious – "was taken" is correct – understanding why requires exploring the nuances of English verb conjugation and tense. This article will delve into the grammatical rules behind this distinction, explore common mistakes, and offer practical examples to solidify your understanding. We'll even touch upon the historical evolution of the verb "to take" to enrich our perspective.

Understanding the Grammatical Error

The phrase "was took" is grammatically incorrect. It uses the past participle of "to take" ("took") incorrectly. In English grammar, past participles are essential for forming perfect tenses (like the past perfect) and the passive voice. The correct past participle of "to take" is "taken."

To illustrate the error, let's consider the basic sentence structure of the past passive:

• Subject + Auxiliary Verb (was/were) + Past Participle

In our case, the correct sentence should follow this structure: "The picture was taken by John." "Was took" violates this fundamental rule by using the simple past tense ("took") instead of the past participle ("taken").

Why "Was Taken" is Correct

The correct phrase, "was taken," utilizes the past participle "taken" in the passive voice. The passive voice emphasizes the action performed on the subject rather than the actor performing the action. In the sentence "The picture was taken by John," the focus is on the picture being taken, not on John's action of taking it.

Let's examine the different tenses and their correct usage with the verb "to take":

• Simple Past: I took the picture. (Active voice)
• Past Participle: The picture has been taken. (Perfect aspect, active or passive voice depending on context)
• Past Passive: The picture was taken. (Passive voice)

The use of "was took" attempts to combine the past tense marker ("was") with the simple past tense verb form ("took"). This doesn't conform to the rules of English grammar for forming the passive voice or perfect tenses.

Common Mistakes and How to Avoid Them

The error in using "was took" often arises from:

• Dialectal Variations: Some non-standard dialects might use constructions similar to "was took." However, in formal writing and standard spoken English, it's considered incorrect.
• Overgeneralization: Speakers might mistakenly overgeneralize the simple past tense form ("took") to all contexts, forgetting the specific requirement for the past participle in the passive voice.
• Lack of Grammatical Awareness: A lack of understanding about the distinction between simple past and past participle contributes to this error.

To avoid this mistake, focus on these points:

1. Identify the Tense: Determine whether you're expressing a simple past action (active voice) or a past action in the passive voice.
2. Use the Correct Participle: Remember that the past participle of "to take" is "taken."
3. Check Sentence Structure: Ensure your sentence follows the correct structure for the chosen tense (e.g., subject + auxiliary verb + past participle for past passive).
4. Practice: Regular practice with sentence construction will reinforce the correct usage.

Examples Illustrating Correct Usage

Here are a few examples demonstrating the correct use of "was taken" and the avoidance of "was took":

• Correct: The photograph was taken at sunrise.
• Incorrect: The photograph was took at sunrise.
• Correct: My phone was taken from my bag.
• Incorrect: My phone was took from my bag.
• Correct: The decision was taken after careful consideration.
• Incorrect: The decision was took after careful consideration.

Historical Context and Language Evolution

While "was took" is grammatically incorrect in modern English, understanding the history of the verb "to take" can shed light on why such errors might arise. Old English had more complex verb conjugations. Over centuries, simplification occurred, leading to the standardization of forms like "taken" as the past participle. The persistence of non-standard forms like "was took" reflects the ongoing evolution and variation within the language. However, for formal communication, adhering to standard grammatical conventions remains crucial.

Beyond Grammar: The Importance of Clear Communication

While focusing on grammatical correctness is vital, it's important to consider the wider context of clear communication. The use of "was took," even if understandable in certain contexts, can detract from the overall professionalism and credibility of your writing or speech. Choosing the grammatically correct form, "was taken," ensures your message is conveyed effectively and without ambiguity.

Conclusion

The distinction between "was taken" and "was took" highlights the importance of understanding English verb conjugation and tense. While "was took" is grammatically incorrect in standard English, understanding its origins and the reasons behind its incorrectness allows us to appreciate the complexities and evolution of language. By focusing on correct usage and practicing the rules of grammar, we can improve our communication skills and ensure our message is clear, accurate, and effective. Always remember the correct structure: Subject + Auxiliary Verb (was/were) + Past Participle ("taken").